2 slots are taken by the “Pitch your project” and “Open Source Design Community” sessions (the spreadsheet assumes those are going in, as per our last community call. That’s why they are not listed).
Good question about the wider advertisement – just to explain my “No” vote (and so far everyone voted “No”).
I think that since this is a curated presence of our community, some sort of base involvement is necessary. If you are not on the forum and just stop by on Twitter and fill out a form (and might not even be at FOSDEM) then that makes no sense.
(Just like with the program of our Summit: It’s decided by people who are there, who are active and who decide what they are interested in and what they want to work on.)
I voted NO because this year it’s a bit late for this process: usually involving the wide community needs a bit of time to reach a conclusion.
Also, the open wider vote can influence some talks: so we need some rules in order to avoid biases and duplication of votes for people that really want to have a talk accepted (I’m just talking in theory).
We had an open vote in at least one other previous year.