# Open Source Design core/board

**URL:** <https://discourse.opensourcedesign.net/t/open-source-design-core-board/3745>\
**Category:** Open Source Design meta\
**Created:** [February 6, 2024, 5:12pm UTC](https://discourse.opensourcedesign.net/t/open-source-design-core-board/3745 "2024-02-06T17:12:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erioldoesdesign](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/discourse.opensourcedesign.net/erioldoesdesign/32/2895_2.png) [@Erioldoesdesign](https://discourse.opensourcedesign.net/u/Erioldoesdesign)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2024, 2:23am UTC](https://discourse.opensourcedesign.net/t/open-source-design-core-board/3745/6 "2024-12-08T02:23:03Z")

</div>

mmm i agree, after some reflection I think having a low member number board e.g no less than 3 and an odd number to allow for voting clarity. But I would see a board function as a place to ‘escalate’ decisions and issue to as well as gather yearly advice (or another time period)

I think the ‘departments’ are a good idea generally to segment the goals and mission of OSD - and would really help to spread the labour of different aspects of OSD’s maintenance tasks.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.opensourcedesign.net/t/open-source-design-core-board/3745)._